Blog

    Ophthalmology ST1 interview format: the two stations

    Most of the ophthalmology ST1 interview's shape is published, in a guide that is easy to miss. What the assessors score against is not published at all.

    So this post keeps the two apart. First what the recruiter states, quoted, and then what SmartOST's interview webinar adds about what the assessors are looking for, marked as the webinar's account rather than an official one.

    What the interview consists of

    The source is the applicant guide for ophthalmology ST1, published by NHS England (South West), which co-ordinates national recruitment into the specialty on behalf of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists. It is brief about the interview itself:

    The assessment itself will include two separate interviews/role plays and each one will be up to 10 minutes in length.

    Note "up to". Ten minutes is the ceiling, not the length.

    Around that:

    • It is virtual. "The assessment/interview will be virtual so there will be no need to attend in person." You book your slot through Oriel, first come first served.
    • Five minutes of reading before each one, which has more in it than it sounds like and gets its own section below.
    • About three quarters of an hour end to end. "The process for each candidate including the initial identity checks, assessment and the debrief will take approximately 45 minutes."

    So at most twenty minutes of the appointment is the thing being scored, and the rest is reading time, checks and debrief.

    The guide does not call them stations

    SmartOST calls them stations, and so does this post. The guide does not. It says "interviews/role plays" and labels them Interview 1 and Interview 2, which is worth knowing before you go looking for the official wording and fail to find the word you searched for.

    One sentence in it matters more than the labels:

    Although the assessments are labelled interview 1 and 2, candidates may start in either one.

    So there is no running order to plan around. Whichever you would rather warm up with, you may not get it, and a preparation plan that assumes the clinical one comes first is planning for a coin toss.

    Station one is a consultation about clinical knowledge

    The guide labels it Interview 1:

    Assessment will be in the form of a medical consultation focusing on clinical knowledge and will involve conversing with an actor playing the role of a patient or carer of a patient.

    Two things in that sentence are easy to read past.

    It is a consultation, not a viva. You are talking to a patient or a carer, played by an actor, rather than answering an examiner's questions. What you know has to arrive inside a conversation with somebody who does not have your vocabulary.

    It says clinical knowledge, and does not narrow it. Nothing in the guide says the clinical station is ophthalmic. In an ophthalmology interview the sensible reading is that it is, and that reading is an inference rather than something anybody has published.

    Then there is who is in the room, which is not who you would expect:

    Two assessors will observe the interaction and score each candidate according to set criteria. The assessors will not be seen or heard by the candidate. At times there will be a third quality assurance assessor or lay representative observing the interaction.

    You are scored by people you cannot see or hear. The only face you get is the actor's, and their reactions belong to the patient rather than to your performance. Nothing about the way you are doing will come back to you while you are doing it, which is a specific thing to be ready for and a reason to practise with a patient rather than with a friendly examiner.

    On what the station asks for, the guide stops. SmartOST's webinar puts it as five things:

    • a safe assessment approach
    • recognising red flags
    • asking about ideas, concerns and expectations
    • initial management steps
    • knowing when to escalate

    with one instruction over the top of them: common things are common, so show the safe steps first.

    Ideas, concerns and expectations sit in this list, in the clinical station. So bring them into that one as well, rather than filing them under communication and ethics and leaving them there.

    Station two is a difficult communication or ethical scenario

    Interview 2, in the same shape:

    Assessment will be in the form of a medical consultation focusing on a difficult communication or ethical scenario and will involve conversing with an actor playing the role of a patient or carer of a patient.

    The rest of that paragraph repeats station one's almost exactly: same actor, same two assessors you cannot see or hear, same occasional third observer.

    The guide names no scenarios. The webinar lists the kinds that come up:

    • errors, delays or cancellations
    • breaking bad news
    • poor prognosis discussions
    • complaints and distress
    • adverse events

    and puts the point of the station in one line, that it tests how you manage sensitive situations with structure, empathy and professionalism. Ideas, concerns and expectations are named here too.

    Every one of those scenarios is a version of the same problem, which is delivering something unwelcome to somebody who did not ask for it. There is a published structure for doing that, and breaking bad news in the ophthalmology ST1 interview takes it apart step by step.

    The five minutes is writing time

    This is the most useful sentence in the guide:

    There will be 5 minutes reading time before candidates enter each interview room to prepare where the scenario will be shared. Candidates can make notes during this time and take the notes into the interview room to refer to.

    Three things follow from it.

    It is five minutes before each station, not five minutes once. The webinar draws the day the same way: reading, station, reading, station.

    You may write, and you may take what you wrote in with you. So the five minutes is not only for reading the scenario. It is for putting down the structure you are about to use while you can still think straight, and the paper goes in with you.

    The room is a video call. The guide's language sounds like a corridor with doors in it, and the same guide says the whole thing is virtual. Entering the room means being admitted to the call.

    Nobody publishes what is being scored

    The assessors "score each candidate according to set criteria", and that is the whole of what the guide says about the criteria. It does not list them, and nothing published ties the person specification's selection criteria to the interview either.

    This is worth stating plainly, because it is not true of the rest of the process. For the self-assessment the same guide gives a domain count, a maximum score and a minimum you have to clear to go on. For the interview there is no equivalent, so every account of what the interview assesses, including the one below, is a reconstruction rather than a quotation.

    SmartOST's webinar frames it as one sentence and four areas. The sentence is that assessors want to see a safe NHS clinician who can work effectively at FY2 or ST1 level. The four:

    • Safety first. Recognise red flags, take appropriate first steps, prioritise patient safety in every scenario.
    • Clear communication. Plain language, demonstrated empathy, a style that adapts to the person in front of you.
    • Appropriate escalation. Knowing when and how to involve a senior.
    • Professional judgement. Staying calm, thinking in a visible structure, holding a professional manner under pressure.

    Treat that as a good working description by people who have done the interview, which is what it is, rather than as the criteria the assessors hold.

    The interview is half of the final score

    The guide is unambiguous about the arithmetic. Its final-score table gives the evidence folder a maximum of 50 points, and the interview, which it calls the Online Assessment, another 50.

    That name is not the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment, which is a different online assessment entirely. The MSRA decides who gets shortlisted and then drops out: "The score from the MSRA will not be included within the total score."

    There is also a floor. "To progress to the offers stage candidates are required to achieve a minimum score of 40% and above in the assessment." A portfolio that scored well does not carry a candidate past that line.

    So twenty minutes at most are worth as much as everything you spent the last two years collecting.

    Where to start

    The format decides more about preparation than the content does. Twenty minutes at most, split in two, no order you can count on, five minutes to write before each, a patient rather than a panel to talk to, and nobody visible to read.

    That points at a specific kind of practice: short, timed, spoken out loud, and with a structure you can put on paper in five minutes. Reading around the subject does none of it.

    SmartOST's interview practice is built to that shape.